The ruling halts a decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that sought to reinstate strict requirements for in-person dispensing of the drug. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented from the decision, which maintains the FDA’s 2023 rule permitting broader access. The case stems from a challenge to the agency’s authority to permanently lift in-person mandates, a move that became a focal point for conservative legal strategy following the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
Advocates emphasize that the legal reprieve is not a permanent victory. Julia Kaye of the ACLU warned that opponents of reproductive care continue to pursue baseless attacks, while Nourbese Flint of All
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!